blue screen of death

Fewer BSODs with Windows 8?

Windows MVP John D. Carrona discusses the improved stability offered with Windows 8/8.1.
–PC Pitstop.

Fewer BSODs with Windows 8?

By Windows Talk

This content was provided by Windows MVP John D. Carrona whom I recently interview here. One of the questions I originally asked him was: Are there fewer BSODs (Blue Screen of Death) with Windows 8 compared to previous versions? It required a longer response, so John has kindly allowed me to publish this article.


Are there fewer BSODs with Windows 8?

A difficult question, as the BSOD’s ebb and flow as time goes on. In general, I find fewer BSOD’s in Win8/8.1 systems than I did in Win7 systems. But there’s some additional considerations here.
There’s the difference between a developer analyzing a BSOD in order to fix a driver that they’ve written and a user trying to fix a BSOD on their own system. When a developer analyzes a crash dump, they usually look at the individual instructions in order to see where the error occurred – whereas a user doesn’t need to look at the instructions (and even if they did, they would have no use for this information as they cannot rebuild the driver).

What can cause a BSOD?

BSOD’s are caused by problems with the operating system in the kernel space. They occur when the kernel or a driver running in kernel mode encounters an error from which it cannot recover. When this happens the system is designed to “fail fast” so that there isn’t any damage to the system. This may result in data loss as the system reboots before the user has a chance to save anything that is being worked on. According to the documentation, a user mode function cannot directly cause a BSOD – it must use accepted routines to perform actions in the kernel space – and the kernel space is where the errors occur that generate BSOD’s.

Article continued here

Shared with permission from Windows Talk.

(Visited 5 times, 1 visits today)

2 thoughts on “Fewer BSODs with Windows 8?

  1. I still have both a WIN XP and WIN 7 machine and use both. WIN XP is still the most intuitive/simple/good basic screens. WIN 7 is more complex for no good reason (for us normal humans). I also have a UBUNTU machine which is interesting and fast. Requires huge, regular downloads, for some reason (trying to be all things for all people?). This reminds me of the early years of the automobile. Hard to say what will finally emerge as better/best. None of this stuff is “ready for prime-time.”

  2. Does it matter if a pile of fecal matter is stable or not? We still have to clean it up.

    Windows 8 is a monument to the hubris of a faceless corporation who has lost sight of the reasons it has made so many profits over the years of serving its customers, meeting THEIR needs. Stability may be king but function is not there. My computer is a multifunctioning and sophisticated device. It is not and never will be a cell phone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *