<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 Official Release Date</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/</link>
	<description>Bring your PC back to life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:05:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RRswamy</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/#comment-8844</link>
		<dc:creator>RRswamy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 06:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=8880#comment-8844</guid>
		<description>I bought vista ultimate the time it was launched in the Indian market. From day one I have been facing problems. After 4 clean installation and trying to get paid help from microsoft this is the answer I got from them 
&quot;As per our discussion on the Windows Vista 64-bit booting and performance issue, we agreed that we would temporarily archive this case.

The update that we got form our escalation Team is that this is a third party hardware issue and it would be very difficult to remotely resolve a problem on such a specific configuration, and in this case, we would not be able to address this issue now.
RRS  although we did not provide the effective solution this time, we still want to let you know that we always strive to provide high-level support to our customers and hope you are happy with the whole process so far with this service request. 
Based on the current situation, we will go ahead and temporarily archive this case.
Following is a summary of the key points for your records.
Action: You are trying to boot to desktop.
Results: booting to desktop takes mot of time.
Cause: Unknown
Resolution: As we were not able to resolve the issue, we are temporarily archiving this case. If you find any resolution, surely we would revert to you.

Till date they have not been able to provide a solution, on the phone they told me that I have a highend machine which is not generally used and hence MS do not and cannot help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought vista ultimate the time it was launched in the Indian market. From day one I have been facing problems. After 4 clean installation and trying to get paid help from microsoft this is the answer I got from them<br />
&#034;As per our discussion on the Windows Vista 64-bit booting and performance issue, we agreed that we would temporarily archive this case.</p>
<p>The update that we got form our escalation Team is that this is a third party hardware issue and it would be very difficult to remotely resolve a problem on such a specific configuration, and in this case, we would not be able to address this issue now.<br />
RRS  although we did not provide the effective solution this time, we still want to let you know that we always strive to provide high-level support to our customers and hope you are happy with the whole process so far with this service request.<br />
Based on the current situation, we will go ahead and temporarily archive this case.<br />
Following is a summary of the key points for your records.<br />
Action: You are trying to boot to desktop.<br />
Results: booting to desktop takes mot of time.<br />
Cause: Unknown<br />
Resolution: As we were not able to resolve the issue, we are temporarily archiving this case. If you find any resolution, surely we would revert to you.</p>
<p>Till date they have not been able to provide a solution, on the phone they told me that I have a highend machine which is not generally used and hence MS do not and cannot help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin cozens</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/#comment-8829</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin cozens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=8880#comment-8829</guid>
		<description>I built myself a new PC at the end of last year.  Knowing what piece of s#@t Vista is I decided to spend over the odss on XP home edition sp3 (OEM). I believe I made the right choice.  With 2gb ram and an E8400 Intel CPU it is a very fast and powerful PC that is more than capable of doing what I ask of it.  Until XP is dead and buried I will stick with what i have.  Long live XP.  WE LOVE YOU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I built myself a new PC at the end of last year.  Knowing what piece of s#@t Vista is I decided to spend over the odss on XP home edition sp3 (OEM). I believe I made the right choice.  With 2gb ram and an E8400 Intel CPU it is a very fast and powerful PC that is more than capable of doing what I ask of it.  Until XP is dead and buried I will stick with what i have.  Long live XP.  WE LOVE YOU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/#comment-8715</link>
		<dc:creator>ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=8880#comment-8715</guid>
		<description>I have been using the win7 rc and so far I am moving in the direction of in favor of this new system. they have approached this new os the same way if not better like they did XP. which is what they should have done with vista, it could have saved them a lot of headaches. i do believe that due to the economic situation. they should price it very low and the same as they are doing in Europe without IE8. I can always download IE8 online for free. I hope they consider the pricing options</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using the win7 rc and so far I am moving in the direction of in favor of this new system. they have approached this new os the same way if not better like they did XP. which is what they should have done with vista, it could have saved them a lot of headaches. i do believe that due to the economic situation. they should price it very low and the same as they are doing in Europe without IE8. I can always download IE8 online for free. I hope they consider the pricing options</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XPuser671</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/#comment-8578</link>
		<dc:creator>XPuser671</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=8880#comment-8578</guid>
		<description>Are you running 32-bit or 64-bit versions?  The 32 bit versions only recognize and utilize up to 3 gigs of ram.  In order to use any more ram, you need to run the 64-bit version of Vista or W7 OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you running 32-bit or 64-bit versions?  The 32 bit versions only recognize and utilize up to 3 gigs of ram.  In order to use any more ram, you need to run the 64-bit version of Vista or W7 OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margie</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/#comment-8574</link>
		<dc:creator>Margie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=8880#comment-8574</guid>
		<description>probably because you&#039;re running 32 bit, which only recognizes upto 3 gig, instead of 64 bit, which requires 3 gig and up.   You won&#039;t get full use of all 4 gigs of ram unless you run the 64 bit version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>probably because you&#039;re running 32 bit, which only recognizes upto 3 gig, instead of 64 bit, which requires 3 gig and up.   You won&#039;t get full use of all 4 gigs of ram unless you run the 64 bit version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/#comment-8554</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=8880#comment-8554</guid>
		<description>One thing I don&#039;t get about Vista and Windows 7 is I have 4 gigs of Memory on 2 computers but it will say only 3 gigs are usable. Why doesn&#039;t it recognize and use all 4 gigs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I don&#039;t get about Vista and Windows 7 is I have 4 gigs of Memory on 2 computers but it will say only 3 gigs are usable. Why doesn&#039;t it recognize and use all 4 gigs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/#comment-8545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=8880#comment-8545</guid>
		<description>I have Vista Business 64-bit on my home desktop and 32-bit on my laptop.  I also have Vista Enterprise 64-bit on my office laptop.  I run all sorts or apps including Adobe Pro 8.  I&#039;v been running all for over a year and have not had one bit of trouble with any.  I think the bad rap that Vista got was somewhat overstated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have Vista Business 64-bit on my home desktop and 32-bit on my laptop.  I also have Vista Enterprise 64-bit on my office laptop.  I run all sorts or apps including Adobe Pro 8.  I&#039;v been running all for over a year and have not had one bit of trouble with any.  I think the bad rap that Vista got was somewhat overstated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PutzyJim</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/#comment-8534</link>
		<dc:creator>PutzyJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=8880#comment-8534</guid>
		<description>I have a Acer core2 duo with 8Gb onboard RAM. When I got it, it had Vista Business with the option of XP Pro downgrade (more of an upgrade....lol).

I tried Vista..for about a week ( all I could stand...lol) and went to XP...reason?....vista sucked, yeah even with 8Gb ram, I had to stop all of the UAC and IE&#039;s addons, IE kept locking up.

I got ahold of Win7 put it on a on a dedicated HDD and was switching back and forth between the 2 drives (XP Pro and Win7).

Now, I have been using Win7 for the last few weeks, alone...then getting files off the XP drive as I need them. 

When I&#039;m able to get 7 I will then use the RC7 as a slave drive then get the RC files onto the new OS.

7 runs sweet at (as of right now) 1.04GB being used (2X IE windows open, antivirus and Yahoo messenger).

Startup time takes less than 1/2 the time compared to XP Pro...shut down time is even faster.

The only trouble I am having is my new Kodak all in one will not print thru Win7 and I&#039;m going to get with them on when they will have the drivers for it.

I&#039;ve only had a few problems with 7 seeing the older games, but only a few...but more then Vista.

The only other &quot;tweeks&quot; that I do to all PCs is lowering the IE settings to 50 ( in browsing history settings) and get into the system startup folder and stopping unnessisary programs from running.
 
I hope this helps some of you.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Acer core2 duo with 8Gb onboard RAM. When I got it, it had Vista Business with the option of XP Pro downgrade (more of an upgrade&#8230;.lol).</p>
<p>I tried Vista..for about a week ( all I could stand&#8230;lol) and went to XP&#8230;reason?&#8230;.vista sucked, yeah even with 8Gb ram, I had to stop all of the UAC and IE&#039;s addons, IE kept locking up.</p>
<p>I got ahold of Win7 put it on a on a dedicated HDD and was switching back and forth between the 2 drives (XP Pro and Win7).</p>
<p>Now, I have been using Win7 for the last few weeks, alone&#8230;then getting files off the XP drive as I need them. </p>
<p>When I&#039;m able to get 7 I will then use the RC7 as a slave drive then get the RC files onto the new OS.</p>
<p>7 runs sweet at (as of right now) 1.04GB being used (2X IE windows open, antivirus and Yahoo messenger).</p>
<p>Startup time takes less than 1/2 the time compared to XP Pro&#8230;shut down time is even faster.</p>
<p>The only trouble I am having is my new Kodak all in one will not print thru Win7 and I&#039;m going to get with them on when they will have the drivers for it.</p>
<p>I&#039;ve only had a few problems with 7 seeing the older games, but only a few&#8230;but more then Vista.</p>
<p>The only other &#034;tweeks&#034; that I do to all PCs is lowering the IE settings to 50 ( in browsing history settings) and get into the system startup folder and stopping unnessisary programs from running.</p>
<p>I hope this helps some of you.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Winger</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/#comment-8495</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Winger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=8880#comment-8495</guid>
		<description>I hope W7 will be an update that doesn&#039;t require reformat and install too!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope W7 will be an update that doesn&#039;t require reformat and install too!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2009/06/04/windows-7-official-release-date/#comment-8482</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=8880#comment-8482</guid>
		<description>This what happend to me. I downloaded windows 7 so I could mess around with it. Microsoft must have thought I had a touch screen.

I do have to say that it was my fault tho. I really didn&#039;t look at what Microsoft came up with on their update page. I just told it to download and install ALL the possible updates.

Well the touch screen part was in there. All of the sudden my computer wouldn&#039;t work at all. It wanted me to do everything by touching the screen instead of using my mouse.

Well I had a hell of a time trying to use the keyboard to do a system restore to get back to where I was.

It took me awhile but I did get it done. I have not read ANYTHING about windows 7 at all.

I have heard that it is going to be less of a hog. I wonder how much less of ram it will use?

I&#039;m running Vista X64 right now and I do have 8 Gig of high speed ram installed and Vista X64 is using 2.18 of the 8 Gig that I have.

What is windows 7 going to use. Would it be something like only 2.0 Gig instead of 2.18? or maybe even 1.0 Gig instead of 2.18?

One may never know unless I run them side by side. I really don&#039;t know if i&#039;m going to upgrade to windows 7 ever at all.

I might consider it if you can simply pop in the Windows 7 DVD and do a upgrade with out have to do a format and a new install.

I don&#039;t want to lose everything. I even heard at one time awhile ago that Vista X64 users were going to get windows 7 upgrade for free.

I really don&#039;t think that is ever going to happen so I think I&#039;ll save up what ever it is going to cost and say what the hell and go for it.

I do know that my system can handle anything that windows 7 can throw at it. Having a Intel Core 2 quad on a Gigabyte MOBO with 8 Gig of ram should be able to handle everything that windows 7 might throw at it.

I also don&#039;t know if there will be any difference between windows 7 64 bit drivers and Vista 64 Bit drivers.

There might be another wait for my other hardware vendors to come up with the windows 7 drivers. I had an Epson printer and after Vista X64 came out it was almost 6 months before Epson put out the drivers for my printer.

I really don&#039;t want to wait that long again. Well I hope for Microsoft&#039;s sake that windows 7 isn&#039;t a flop like everyone said Vista was.

I personly LOVE Vista X64. I have had it installed since Vista X64 came out and have had not a SINGLE problem with it.

Like I said before. I think that people that did have problems with it is because they were trying to run Vista X64 on an older machine and when they couldn&#039;t find drivers for it they blamed it on Microsoft.

Blame the vendors not Microsoft. The vendors knew when Vista was going to come out and they had plenty of time to get the drivers ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This what happend to me. I downloaded windows 7 so I could mess around with it. Microsoft must have thought I had a touch screen.</p>
<p>I do have to say that it was my fault tho. I really didn&#039;t look at what Microsoft came up with on their update page. I just told it to download and install ALL the possible updates.</p>
<p>Well the touch screen part was in there. All of the sudden my computer wouldn&#039;t work at all. It wanted me to do everything by touching the screen instead of using my mouse.</p>
<p>Well I had a hell of a time trying to use the keyboard to do a system restore to get back to where I was.</p>
<p>It took me awhile but I did get it done. I have not read ANYTHING about windows 7 at all.</p>
<p>I have heard that it is going to be less of a hog. I wonder how much less of ram it will use?</p>
<p>I&#039;m running Vista X64 right now and I do have 8 Gig of high speed ram installed and Vista X64 is using 2.18 of the 8 Gig that I have.</p>
<p>What is windows 7 going to use. Would it be something like only 2.0 Gig instead of 2.18? or maybe even 1.0 Gig instead of 2.18?</p>
<p>One may never know unless I run them side by side. I really don&#039;t know if i&#039;m going to upgrade to windows 7 ever at all.</p>
<p>I might consider it if you can simply pop in the Windows 7 DVD and do a upgrade with out have to do a format and a new install.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t want to lose everything. I even heard at one time awhile ago that Vista X64 users were going to get windows 7 upgrade for free.</p>
<p>I really don&#039;t think that is ever going to happen so I think I&#039;ll save up what ever it is going to cost and say what the hell and go for it.</p>
<p>I do know that my system can handle anything that windows 7 can throw at it. Having a Intel Core 2 quad on a Gigabyte MOBO with 8 Gig of ram should be able to handle everything that windows 7 might throw at it.</p>
<p>I also don&#039;t know if there will be any difference between windows 7 64 bit drivers and Vista 64 Bit drivers.</p>
<p>There might be another wait for my other hardware vendors to come up with the windows 7 drivers. I had an Epson printer and after Vista X64 came out it was almost 6 months before Epson put out the drivers for my printer.</p>
<p>I really don&#039;t want to wait that long again. Well I hope for Microsoft&#039;s sake that windows 7 isn&#039;t a flop like everyone said Vista was.</p>
<p>I personly LOVE Vista X64. I have had it installed since Vista X64 came out and have had not a SINGLE problem with it.</p>
<p>Like I said before. I think that people that did have problems with it is because they were trying to run Vista X64 on an older machine and when they couldn&#039;t find drivers for it they blamed it on Microsoft.</p>
<p>Blame the vendors not Microsoft. The vendors knew when Vista was going to come out and they had plenty of time to get the drivers ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
