Tests

Research

Libraries

Help Forums

Newsletter

Ask the Pros

RSS Feeds

Authors

Meta

Restaurants YES! Processor NO!

April 10, 2009 by shogan in The Pit Blog
intelboxstars

Intel introduces new rating system. How simple it was when all you needed was a processor family name and clock speed. Getting the fastest was just a matter of buying the most recent architecture with the highest clock speed. The battle between AMD and Intel was only a matter of watching for the next big CPU.

Between then and now there has been an ever-increasing list of additional things to consider when buying the best.

Architecture, cache, dual core, quad core, clock speed, bus speed, Hyper-Threading and equivalency numbering, have all been rolled together to present a confusing picture to today’s unprepared consumers.

What is Intel's latest answer to all this confusion? STARS! Intel has implemented a new rating system using between 1 and 5 stars to rate its processor’s performance. The consumer needs some help but this won't do it. I’m betting it will wind up being just one more piece of useless information printed on packages and labels. Will a 2 star Extreme label be faster than a 3 star Core Duo? Will there be sets of stars for energy efficiency, clock speed, and cache? Will this grow into a milky way spreading across CPU boxes. Yes, it probably will.

Long story short consumers will still need an understanding of processors in order to make an informed decision about their next purchase. Every year it gets harder and harder to find the actual specifications of the hardware being used in systems. Give us the real information and make it accessible. Just print the complete specs on the package or a sticker on the computer. Stars won't shine through the clouds.

Related posts:


One Response to “Restaurants YES! Processor NO!”

  1. MicHaeL Says:

    Yeah, I noticed this, even years ago.
    I was trying to research on newer processors, to get one eventually, through the Intel-website.
    But it was no use as there barely is anything to research.
    It's as if they just don't want you to know the exact specifications and take their word for how the products are compared.
    I do kind of believe it, but it's all just raw comparison.
    I'm not a nitpicker as far as speed and all goes down to every single MHz.
    But still I'd like to know what it can do for my needs and for how long, what technologies it used and with what other parts I can use it, etc. etc.

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType

 Join our Group on Facebook  Follow Us on Twitter RSS Feed Our Youtube Library

Polls

What is your back up strategy for your PC?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

RSS Recent Posts

Technologizer: 25 Most Notable Quotes in Tech History  Nov 20
By Harry McCracken It’s not love, war, or baseball. But over the years some memorable things ha...
Use Your Droid as a Modem…Tethering  Nov 20
I'm going home for Thanksgiving and I'll be tethered all the way. It's simple, fas...
The Dodge Retort: Twitter, Facebook fertile phishing grounds  Nov 19
By John Dodge Phishing was not on my list of things to educate myself about until I was victim to ...
Ask Leo: Secure Delete – What is it and do I need it?  Nov 18
By Leo Notenboom Although there are many software utilities that claim to be able to delete data ...
Chris Pirillo Video: How to Convert Cassettes to MP3  Nov 18
One of the first pieces of hardware I ever remember lusting after was a cassette player. I was pre...

Tags

Scan for new drivers for FREE! WinPatrol PLUS 2010 Optimize your PC! Eradicate Spyware!