<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Graphics Hardware from PC Pitstop 3D Video Tests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/</link>
	<description>Bring your PC back to life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:05:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corpsecrank</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/#comment-7435</link>
		<dc:creator>Corpsecrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 04:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=2936#comment-7435</guid>
		<description>This test may reflect the actual readings from the test but should not be used to determine what a good video card is.

Something you should really keep in mind is that video cards may be ATI or Nvidia but the manufacturer makes or breaks the card as a whole. Just because the GPU mounted on the card is an ATI or Nvidia means little. If the card was manufactured poorly by what ever company then the card will run like crap.

If you want an accurate depiction of what each card is actually about you would need to go find test results where an ATI card manufactured by ATI solely was tested against an Nvidia card manufactured by Nvidia solely with both cards being tested on an identicle set up under identicle conditions. Otherwise you cannot tell which chip is actually better with any accuracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This test may reflect the actual readings from the test but should not be used to determine what a good video card is.</p>
<p>Something you should really keep in mind is that video cards may be ATI or Nvidia but the manufacturer makes or breaks the card as a whole. Just because the GPU mounted on the card is an ATI or Nvidia means little. If the card was manufactured poorly by what ever company then the card will run like crap.</p>
<p>If you want an accurate depiction of what each card is actually about you would need to go find test results where an ATI card manufactured by ATI solely was tested against an Nvidia card manufactured by Nvidia solely with both cards being tested on an identicle set up under identicle conditions. Otherwise you cannot tell which chip is actually better with any accuracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarge</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=2936#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>Hi all
This makes for good reading. Its no good putting a Â£300 card on a Â£50 motherboard and a Â£30 power supply your going to get poor results what ever the card! I have a 1x280gtx runing with vista os and my 3d06 score is 17038 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7838165 
and guess what im still no good at online gaming lol.At the end of the day whats does it matter who is the faster its down to the player in the end!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all<br />
This makes for good reading. Its no good putting a Â£300 card on a Â£50 motherboard and a Â£30 power supply your going to get poor results what ever the card! I have a 1&#215;280gtx runing with vista os and my 3d06 score is 17038 <a href="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7838165" rel="nofollow">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7838165</a><br />
and guess what im still no good at online gaming lol.At the end of the day whats does it matter who is the faster its down to the player in the end!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryle Shelly</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/#comment-4370</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryle Shelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=2936#comment-4370</guid>
		<description>The Overdrive 3D video tests consists of a suite of tests covering 6 areas of performance: Transform, Lighting, Multi Texturing, Blending, Vertex Shader and Bump Mapping ...

Looks like a pretty thorough Test to me , I think that it is better than 3dm06 , personally , because it is more graphics based ,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Overdrive 3D video tests consists of a suite of tests covering 6 areas of performance: Transform, Lighting, Multi Texturing, Blending, Vertex Shader and Bump Mapping &#8230;</p>
<p>Looks like a pretty thorough Test to me , I think that it is better than 3dm06 , personally , because it is more graphics based ,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IntelGuy</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/#comment-4358</link>
		<dc:creator>IntelGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=2936#comment-4358</guid>
		<description>You can skip the 3D test from the debug page: http://www.pcpitstop.com/betapit/Debug.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can skip the 3D test from the debug page: <a href="http://www.pcpitstop.com/betapit/Debug.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcpitstop.com/betapit/Debug.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonynona</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonynona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=2936#comment-4299</guid>
		<description>There certainly is no lack of heated comments from both camps in this battle over who has the best, fastest, etc. video card, or which manufacturer is best, NVidia or ATI.  These types of arguments have been going on from prior to the PC, Windows or Apple, MS/DOS or IBM/DOS, before modems, et al.

I base my opinions on actual use, benchmarks, experiences in dealing with the various companies, educated discussions with my peers, etc.  Based on 30+ years of professional experience in microprocessing, microelectronics and communications, I&#039;ve seen the industry from its beginnings (before the first 300baud Hayes modem); I&#039;ve also had the enjoyable experience of watching it develop into what it is today (all of the companies starting up, falling on their faces, surviving, fading away, etc.  Sorry, I digress...

Overall, NVidia and NVidia-based graphic cards are a better buy than ATI; you need to pay a lot more $ for high-end hardware, but that&#039;s to be expected.  More support, more driver updates and a larger owner/user-base, not to mention better customer service (PNY is a good source and they&#039;ve been around for years).  No matter what you choose, if you&#039;re wanting high-end performance, you&#039;ll need to first base a system around a solid motherboard and CPU combination that are matched for each other&#039;s use together and that can run circles around your add-ons.  In addition, you must also buy a power supply that provides more than is needed by at least 50%; in most cases that&#039;ll mean you start with 1000W and go up. (Here&#039;s an address for those who aren&#039;t sure about their systems&#039; power needs; refer to the Recommended Power Supply Wattage Calculator at http://support.asus.com/PowerSupplyCalculator/PSCalculator.aspx?SLanguage=en-us and it should let you know better than just guessing.  An example of power needs, take PCIex16 SLI cards.  Two of them and you&#039;ll need 1000W to begin with!  Rember, all kinds of odd things can/will occur when your power supply is only marginal and benchmarking of any type will result in totally inaccurate outcomes.

Anyway, that&#039;s all I got for now, gotta run!

cu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There certainly is no lack of heated comments from both camps in this battle over who has the best, fastest, etc. video card, or which manufacturer is best, NVidia or ATI.  These types of arguments have been going on from prior to the PC, Windows or Apple, MS/DOS or IBM/DOS, before modems, et al.</p>
<p>I base my opinions on actual use, benchmarks, experiences in dealing with the various companies, educated discussions with my peers, etc.  Based on 30+ years of professional experience in microprocessing, microelectronics and communications, I&#039;ve seen the industry from its beginnings (before the first 300baud Hayes modem); I&#039;ve also had the enjoyable experience of watching it develop into what it is today (all of the companies starting up, falling on their faces, surviving, fading away, etc.  Sorry, I digress&#8230;</p>
<p>Overall, NVidia and NVidia-based graphic cards are a better buy than ATI; you need to pay a lot more $ for high-end hardware, but that&#039;s to be expected.  More support, more driver updates and a larger owner/user-base, not to mention better customer service (PNY is a good source and they&#039;ve been around for years).  No matter what you choose, if you&#039;re wanting high-end performance, you&#039;ll need to first base a system around a solid motherboard and CPU combination that are matched for each other&#039;s use together and that can run circles around your add-ons.  In addition, you must also buy a power supply that provides more than is needed by at least 50%; in most cases that&#039;ll mean you start with 1000W and go up. (Here&#039;s an address for those who aren&#039;t sure about their systems&#039; power needs; refer to the Recommended Power Supply Wattage Calculator at <a href="http://support.asus.com/PowerSupplyCalculator/PSCalculator.aspx?SLanguage=en-us" rel="nofollow">http://support.asus.com/PowerSupplyCalculator/PSCalculator.aspx?SLanguage=en-us</a> and it should let you know better than just guessing.  An example of power needs, take PCIex16 SLI cards.  Two of them and you&#039;ll need 1000W to begin with!  Rember, all kinds of odd things can/will occur when your power supply is only marginal and benchmarking of any type will result in totally inaccurate outcomes.</p>
<p>Anyway, that&#039;s all I got for now, gotta run!</p>
<p>cu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne G</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/#comment-4232</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=2936#comment-4232</guid>
		<description>Your new OverDrive tests are good -- except  -- they crash at the 3D tests if you are running an older computer that doesn&#039;t have the latest graphics card.  OEM integrated graphics is one thing, but the test crashes with a OEM AGP card w/ 16MB of RAM.  There should be a way to skip the 3D portion and still run the rest of the test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your new OverDrive tests are good &#8212; except  &#8212; they crash at the 3D tests if you are running an older computer that doesn&#039;t have the latest graphics card.  OEM integrated graphics is one thing, but the test crashes with a OEM AGP card w/ 16MB of RAM.  There should be a way to skip the 3D portion and still run the rest of the test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xampldt</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/#comment-4220</link>
		<dc:creator>xampldt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=2936#comment-4220</guid>
		<description>8454fps on an asus engtx 260 and this site ranks it in the top 1%. I have no doubts about this test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8454fps on an asus engtx 260 and this site ranks it in the top 1%. I have no doubts about this test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dark41</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/#comment-4207</link>
		<dc:creator>dark41</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 03:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=2936#comment-4207</guid>
		<description>&quot; txyankee Says:
October 10th, 2008 at 9:21 am

My nvidia 7800 GTX out performs them all according to the pc online test results. but only using the older drivers not the newer onesâ€¦&quot;

That would be an interesting glitch. I&#039;m curious to see your results for comparison. I have a 7900GTX TDH Extreme that beats every other 7900 or 7800 that I&#039;ve seen to date in any benchmark, and it sits about where it should on the Pitstop tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034; txyankee Says:<br />
October 10th, 2008 at 9:21 am</p>
<p>My nvidia 7800 GTX out performs them all according to the pc online test results. but only using the older drivers not the newer onesâ€¦&#034;</p>
<p>That would be an interesting glitch. I&#039;m curious to see your results for comparison. I have a 7900GTX TDH Extreme that beats every other 7900 or 7800 that I&#039;ve seen to date in any benchmark, and it sits about where it should on the Pitstop tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BM</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/#comment-4206</link>
		<dc:creator>BM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=2936#comment-4206</guid>
		<description>I noticed somebody said something about thier amd beating an intel quadcore. A multiple core processor must have a load on the processor to cause the other cores to kick in. In other words the quad core must have multiple programs running. That was you Flying_Caveman I believe. Many people have wrong conception of multiple core processors. Also the AMD probably had a higher CPU so if you just running one program on the intel it would win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed somebody said something about thier amd beating an intel quadcore. A multiple core processor must have a load on the processor to cause the other cores to kick in. In other words the quad core must have multiple programs running. That was you Flying_Caveman I believe. Many people have wrong conception of multiple core processors. Also the AMD probably had a higher CPU so if you just running one program on the intel it would win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/10/08/top-ranking-graphics-hardware-from-pc-pitstop-3d-video-tests/#comment-4194</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/?p=2936#comment-4194</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess my ATI HD3200 integrated graphics at 1152x864/70/32bit is a slow Sally at only 485fps, but I&#039;m not a gamer so what do I care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess my ATI HD3200 integrated graphics at 1152&#215;864/70/32bit is a slow Sally at only 485fps, but I&#039;m not a gamer so what do I care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
